Real Estate

I would like to put my home for sale available to the residents of california who are looking to move to arizona. Is it legal to have a realestate agent from california sell my home in arizona?
Great thanks all.

Only if the agent you pick is licensed to sell real estate in both California and Arizona.
Usually a real estate agent is licensed to sell in one state only.
You would do best to list with an Arizona realtor, and ask them to advertise in California too.

Largest solar farm in Southeast planned for Florida

The $1.5 billion project in Gadsden County would produce 400 megawatts of energy, enough to power about 32,000 homes.

http://weblogs.sun-sentinel.com/business/realestate/housekeys/blog/2011/09/largest_solar_plant_in_southea.html
Sorry. 32,000 homes.

No. Very good idea, nothing can grow on those land fills they put the solar panels anyway.

Theres a lot of online real estate advertising websites like homepages.com, housevalues.com/justlisted.com, realestate.com, etc. They charge a large fee and make you commit for a certain number of months. I wonder if it is worth paying the charges? Do you get a considerable amount of leads? Do you get your money’s worth? Is there anything that you think is missing from their service?

I hate paying for services, so my listings are on realtor.com, but I agressively use zillow.com and trulia. com along with Homegain.com as they are FREE and the still get results. I pay Dues to NAR so why should I pay to get stuff on their website?
14 years Full Time Realtor

RealEstate Progress will bring up the economy rapidly, but the banks need to corporate,
especially the ones that took buyout. This should be a part of the deal.

I am not sure what your question is, but your statement is far more perceptive than most I see on Y!A. The bailout itself was heavily tilted by the power, wealth, and political influence of its benefactors solely in favor of those benefactors.

The callous greed of these benefactors is evidenced in their obdurate opposition to any contribution on their part to rebuilding our economy. We helped the wrong people.

We would have acted much more prudently had we bailed out most of the people who have lost their homes to foreclosure. The banks and other speculators holding questionable mortgages would have been paid off and thereby avoided bankruptcy without the hundreds of billions we poured directly into their coffers. Millions of homeowners would still have their homes; these houses would not be flooding the market depressing the value of residential estate.

With millions of people able to keep their homes and their equity, personal spending would not have fallen as precipitously as it did. Portfolios would not have lost their value; as a result, the big banks, insurance companies, etc., would have remained solvent and would have been able to keep all (or most of) their employees. With more people able to spend money, fewer businesses would have lost their customers. With more businesses solvent, fewer people would have lot their jobs.

The bailouts accomplished very little beyond quickly restoring to a few ultra-rich speculators and to monopolistic Corporate America the wealth (and much more) that they had lost in the early part of the recession. Now these corporations sit awash in $2 trillion, which they do not invest, their promises to do so notwithstanding.

We can still salvage our economy. Since the greedy elite will not invest this immense treasure without assurance of immediate profit, we should take much of that idle capital through taxation and spend it on rebuilding and modernizing our infrastructure. Doing so would not be MAKING work; it is doing work that is long overdue. In the process, we could put millions of Americans back to work–and back to spending and restarting our economy.